(New page: {{Forumheader|Watercooler}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> So I was just thinking that one of the features of our port...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> |
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> |
||
So I was just thinking that one of the features of our portal pages should be a full (or very nearly full) cast list with links to both the character and the actor. Besides that, the only other thing I'd thought of is maybe not having all the category stuff right there on the page, but instead having a link to the root category. But I'm not sure about that one yet. '''[[User:Gonk|<span style="color: #669999;">Gonk</span>]]''' <small><sup>([[User talk:Gonk|<span style="color: #669999;">''Gonk!''</span>]])</sup></small> 13:41, 13 January 2008 (UTC) |
So I was just thinking that one of the features of our portal pages should be a full (or very nearly full) cast list with links to both the character and the actor. Besides that, the only other thing I'd thought of is maybe not having all the category stuff right there on the page, but instead having a link to the root category. But I'm not sure about that one yet. '''[[User:Gonk|<span style="color: #669999;">Gonk</span>]]''' <small><sup>([[User talk:Gonk|<span style="color: #669999;">''Gonk!''</span>]])</sup></small> 13:41, 13 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
| + | *Not a bad idea, the last one, considering that category pages can have content, too. I'm all for all of it, personally. [[User:Graestan|<span style="color: #004500;">'''Graestan'''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Graestan|<span style="color: #004500;">'''Talk'''</span>]])</sup> 23:05, 13 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 23:05, 13 January 2008
Forums: Index > Watercooler > How to handle the portals
So I was just thinking that one of the features of our portal pages should be a full (or very nearly full) cast list with links to both the character and the actor. Besides that, the only other thing I'd thought of is maybe not having all the category stuff right there on the page, but instead having a link to the root category. But I'm not sure about that one yet. Gonk (Gonk!) 13:41, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Not a bad idea, the last one, considering that category pages can have content, too. I'm all for all of it, personally. Graestan(Talk) 23:05, 13 January 2008 (UTC)